PLEASE NOTE: As a result of the server upgrade, all event registration is currently unavailable until April 28th.
Page Action:

FASB's Proposal on Expected Credit Losses Released Dec 20, 2012; Comments Due April 30, 2013

Just in time for holiday reading, and not taking any chances that Dethe world may end on Dec. 21, FASB released on Dec. 20, 2012 its Proposed Accounting Standards Update entitled, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15).  

Apropos just in case the world was going to end at some future date, FASB's proposed model reflects a move away from the traditional "incurred loss" model toward an "expected loss" model.

The move to more of an "expected loss" model was recommended by many banking and financial institution groups and regulatory groups during and following the financial crisis when some held that such insitutions were underreserved out of fears of crossing GAAP and regulatory lines whose original intent was meant to bar so-called "cookie jar" reserves, or reserves set aside purely for income smoothing.

FASB's proposal attempts to add more flexibility vs. the incurred loss model, by requiring the issuer "to take into account all available information and recognize its current estimate of cash flows not expected to be collected."
The proposal issued by FASB at the end of 2012 differs from the current version of the IASB's anticipated upcoming proposal, described as a 'three bucket approach,' in which "full recognition of an allowance for the expected credit loss would be deferred for financial assets for which a loss event is expected to occur beyond 12 months." On a call with members of the press, FASB Chairman Leslie Seidman described the FASB's decision not to go with the IASB's '3-bucket approach' based on significant feedback from FASB constituents who described the 3-bucket approach as raising operational and practicability issues as well as raising theoretical/economic issues of remaining closer to the current position which some claimed was underreserved.  

For more info on FASB's proposal, see FASB's press release , this 3-page FASB in Focus, and FASB's Dec. 2012 podcast featuring Board Member Tom Linsmeier. 

Some interestesting commentary has come out on FASB's proposal, including from the usual suspects, (i.e. no-holds-barred commentators such as Tom Selling (what would you expect from a blog called The Accounting Onion ?)  , The American Bankers Association, and others.

But the most important comments of all will be YOUR comments on the ED. The comment deadline to FASB is April 30, 2013. Watch for release of the IASB's ED as well (expected to be released in 1Q2013 according to FASB's press release), and feel free to comment on both ED's.

Posted: 1/2/2013 11:47:27 AM by Edith Orenstein | with 0 comments
Filed under: credit losses,Financial Instruments-Credit Losses,FASB,IASB,credit impairment

Trackback URL:,-2012;-Comments-Due-April-30,-2013.aspx

Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment

Enter security code:
 Security code

Subscribe to Financial Reporting Blog

Submit your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search Blog:

clear results Rss


Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20132013
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20122012
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20112011
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20102010
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20092009
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20082008